(Source: vinaffleck)
Faris Odeh, 14, became an instant Palestinian hero after this photo was taken Oct. 29, 2000. Less than two weeks later, an Israeli soldier shot and killed him in a similar clash near the same site in the Gaza.
(AP Photo / Laurent Rebours)
Forever Reblog
(Source: notclarissa)
Kalike Tatu (kris) studio IX, manchester u.k
My new black-work, on one of my favorite blogs. Sweeeeet
dear you are as beautiful as a bank in flames
Unrelated to the theme of this blog, but i couldn’t resist not reblogging this purely for the what the fuckkk factor.
On a side note i hope Colonel Sanders’ ghost is burning in hell
Created by the wonderful and talented Anarchei
http://anarchei.me/This is so cool
- “Market anarchism” isn’t anarchist.
- Voluntaryism isn’t anarchist.
- “Anarcho-socialism” is redundant and is principally use by “anarcho-capitalists”, who, by the way, are not anarchists.
- Primitivism and anarchism are incompatible.
- Agorism is questionable, to say the least.
- “Market anarchism” isn’t anarchist.
- Voluntaryism isn’t anarchist.
- “Anarcho-socialism” is redundant and is principally use by “anarcho-capitalists”, who, by the way, are not anarchists.
- Primitivism and anarchism are incompatible.
- Agorism is questionable, to say the least.
- “Market anarchism” isn’t anarchist.
- Voluntaryism isn’t anarchist.
- “Anarcho-socialism” is redundant and is principally use by “anarcho-capitalists”, who, by the way, are not anarchists.
- Primitivism and anarchism are incompatible.
- Agorism is questionable, to say the least.
I disagree, market anarchists aren’t that bad, though I agree with ancaps and voluntaryists not being anarchists. What’s incompatible about primitivism and anarchism?
This isn’t about being “bad”. Without even goin’ into it, anarchism is strictly ANTI-capitalist. “Market anarchism” is NOT strictly anti-capitalist and is in fact compatible with and generally indistinguishable from capitalism. “Market anarchism” is not anarchist.
Anarchism is a sophisticated form of social organization. Primitivism precludes such organization. The primitivist views social organization as inherently paternalistic.
I value primitivist critiques and don’t think its entirely incompatible with anarchism, but I do see your point as the practice of anarchy, albeit voluntary self organization, would still result in complex social organization.